Olsson,
T., Lindgren, D. and Li, B. 2001. Balancing Genetic Gain and Relatedness
in Seed Orchards. ( Silvae Genetica.in press). “Printed” in Olsson (2001).
The traditional way to avoid related
mating and subsequent inbreeding depression in seed orchards is to use only
unrelated clones for orchard establishment. As tree-breeding programs move to
advanced generations, relatedness (coancestry) among candidates for seed orchard
selections becomes more common, especially for high breeding value candidates.
The traditional way of selecting the ones with the highest breeding value,
provided they are unrelated, is referred to as Restricted Selection (RS). In
order to consider breeding value as well as relatedness, an alternative
selection method, based on a value criterion for the whole group of selected
clones, is presented in this paper. The method, here called Group Merit
Selection (GMS), is based on a suggestion by Lindgren
and Mullin (1997), but
modified for seed orchard selection by neglecting selfing and self-coancestry.
The method can be regarded as the selection of a group
of clones that maximizes expected genetic value
(predicted genetic gain minus inbreeding depression).
A case study was conducted in which
twenty clones for a seed orchard were selected among second-generation loblolly
pine (Pinus teada L.) selections from
the NCSU-Industry cooperative breeding program. Assuming an observed inbreeding
depression of 40% for one unit coefficient of inbreeding, penalty constants
based on estimated breeding values at age 8 was corresponding with inbreeding
depression. That gave 12% more genetic value for GMS than Restricted Selection.
Predictions of the penalty constant considering additional relevant factors
(such as pollen contamination, breeding values based on immature trials, and
unrepresentative experimental sites) resulted in selection of the same clones.
Changes among the selected clones did not occur until relatedness reached twice
the penalty constant, suggesting that GMS solutions are rather robust.